ISTJ (Introversion, Sensing, Thinking, Judging) Learning Style
Quiet, serious, earn success by thoroughness and dependability. Practical, matter-of-fact, realistic, and responsible. Decide logically what should be done and work toward it steadily, regardless of distractions. Take pleasure in making everything orderly and organized – their work, their home, their life. Value traditions and loyalty.
~Excerpted from Introduction to Type®
by Isabel Briggs Myers
_______________________________________________
Frequency
ISTJ – | 11.6% of the total population |
16.4% of the male population | |
6.9% of the female population |
Introversion (I) | 50.7% of the total population |
Sensing (S) | 73.3% of the total population |
Thinking (T) | 40.2% of the total population |
Judging (J) | 54.1% of the total population |
_______________________________________________
The estimated frequency table was compiled from a variety of MBTI® results from 1972 through 2002, including data banks at the Center for Applications of Psychological Type; CPP, Inc; and Stanford Research Institute (SRI).
Learner Keyword: reflective and systematic1
Learner Question
ISTJs, while learning, address the question, “Is this practical and useful to me?”2
Learning Style
ISTJs prefer to use knowledge to gain experience and in practical application. Knowledge needs to have a logical flow with a systematic, step by step instructions.
ISTJs need to understand the details in what they are doing and how these details apply to life. They possess a linear, organized and even systematic method to thinking. They are detail-oriented, preferring specificity to vague generalities, being fact driven.
ISTJs enjoy experiencing, doing and practicing. They like proof and practicing helps to solidify the proof they need as they experience the practical application. They are good at focusing and can concentrate for long periods of time. Rational and logic drive their learning process, especially when attached to a clear goal or desirable product.
ISTJs are motivated by personal achievement, status and recognition within their learning.
Cognitive Environment
ISTJs prefer to learn in structured classrooms which offer hands-on experiences. Within these structured learning environments, ISTJs also prefer objectives and rubrics for all learning, assignments and assessments.
ISTJs are independent learners. They learn well on their own. They enjoy research opportunities and real-life examples.
ISTJs value high quality teaching with informative instructors.
ISTJs are most comfortable
- Knowing the expectations required of their work -using objectives and rubrics
- Enjoy hands-on learning
- Independent learning
- Details and facts over theory and general concepts
- Structure
- Need to assimilate and prepare in advance -need to know what they will be learning and studying
- Prefer to review and summarize
- Research
- Having a clear purpose for learning
- Need immediate opportunities for practical application of the new knowledge
ISTJs are least comfortable:
- Faced-paced instruction
- Group work
- Being with people who are easily distracted
- Theory, abstract information and general concepts
- Lack of objectives, rubrics, unstructured learning environments
- Encountering obstacles to their learning and applying solutions
- Surprises – doing something without or with little warning
Learn More:
For more information on teacher and classroom tips, learner tips, instructional strategies and assessment strategies, see MBTI Learning Styles: A Practical Approach or learn more on Udemy.
Click on one of the sixteen personality types for more information:
Click on one of these dimension for more information:
For other learning styles: MBTI Learning Styles – A Practical Approach Available in paperback; Kindle; and pdf versions
References
Bonwell, C. & Eison, J. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, Washington, D.C
Career Assessment. (2017). The 16 Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Personality Types (MBTI personality types). Retrieved from: http://careerassessmentsite.com/tests/myers-briggs-tests/about-the-myers-briggs-type-indicator/the-16-myers-briggs-personality-types/
CPP, Inc. (2017). Linking MBTI® Personality Type to Learning Style – Strategies and Insights. Retrieved from: http://www.cppblogcentral.com/cpp-connect/linking-mbti-personality-type-to-learning-style-strategies-and-insights/
Defiance College. (2106). What’s Your Personality Type? Retrieved from: http://library.defiance.edu/learningstyles/myersbriggs
Gregory, G. (2008). Differentiated instructional strategies in practice: training, implementation, and supervision (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. p. 97-99.
Humanmetrics. (2017). Learning Styles. Retrieved from: http://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/learning-styles
Kiser, H. (2017). Choice board. Retrieved from: https://hillarykiser.blogspot.com/2012/10/choice-board.html?showComment=1491939410939#c9063789945839625994
Krafka, K. (2017) Learning Menus. Retrieved from: http://prescriptionforgiftedsuccess.weebly.com/learning-menus.html
Litemind. (2017). What is mind mapping? Retrieved from: https://litemind.com/what-is-mind-mapping/
Martinez, M. (2006). What is metacognition. Phi Delta Kappan, 64(10), 696-699.
Melvin, J. (2017). Personality Type as an Indicator of Learning Style. University of Rochester. Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/Tracy/Downloads/JMelvinSGf13paper%20(2).pdf
Myers & Briggs Foundation. (2017). How frequent is my type? Retrieved from: http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/my-mbti-results/how-frequent-is-my-type.htm
Myers & Briggs Foundation. (2017). Type and Learning. Retrieved from: http://www.myersbriggs.org/type-use-for-everyday-life/type-and-learning/
Myers, I. (1998). Introduction to Type: A Guide to Understanding Your Results on the MBTI Instrument. Consulting Psychologists Press.
Myers, I., McCaulley, M., Quenk, N. & Hammer, A. (2009). MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Instrument. Consulting Psychologists Press.
Okoro, C. & Chukwudi, E. K. (2011). Metacognitive skills: A viable tool for self-directed learning. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 1(4), 71-76.
Pelley, J.W. (2008). The Success Types Learning Style Type Indicator. Retrieved from: Texas Tech University. https://www.ttuhsc.edu/som/success/lsti.aspx
Smith, C. V. & Cardaciotto, L. (2011). Is active learning like broccoli? Student perceptions of active learning in large lecture classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 53-61.
University of Texas. (2017). Experiential Learning. Retrieved from: https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/teaching/strategies/overview/experiential-learning
Western Nevada College. (2017). Personality Types and Learning. Retrieved from: http://www.wnc.edu/mbti/personality-types/
Tracy Atkinson is certified in Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) by CPP, Inc. The findings on learning styles derive from research, experience and observations.
Tracy Atkinson, a mother of six, lives in the Midwest with her husband and spirited dachshunds. She is a teacher, having taught elementary school to higher education, holding degrees in elementary education and a master’s in higher education. Her passions include researching, studying and investigating the attributes of self-directed learners. She has published several titles, including: The Art of Learning Journals, Calais: The Annals of the Hidden, Rachel’s 8 and Securing Your Tent. She is currently exploring the attributes of self-directed learners: The Five Characteristics of Self-Directed Learners.
Comments are closed